Meghan Markle’s Latest Public Appearance Sparked Backlash — And It’s All Because of Her Security Detail

“Three SUVs, decoy cars, and former Secret Service agents—Meghan, seriously?” 🚔👑 Meghan Markle’s latest New York outing has sparked outrage over what many call an excessive, Hollywood-level security show. Was it justified protection or pure PR drama? Full story and reactions in the article below 👇

It seems not a day goes by without Meghan Markle and Prince Harry making headlines — and this time, it’s all about security. Meghan’s latest public outing in New York has caused a stir online, with many users calling her security measures over-the-top.

The 43-year-old Duchess of Sussex was spotted arriving at a Broadway show in Manhattan, but what caught everyone’s attention wasn’t the event — it was the convoy that brought her there. Meghan appeared with a motorcade of three SUVs and an unmarked police car. According to reports, she had hired former Secret Service agents for personal protection, and two detectives were also seen riding in one of the vehicles.

Two of the cars were reportedly decoys, meant to throw off paparazzi in case of a chase. However, no chase occurred, and the mostly empty motorcade drove through New York streets, drawing attention from people and drivers nearby.

One photographer called the security detail “completely abnormal and totally excessive.” They added that even major celebrities like Kim Kardashian, Beyoncé, and Rihanna usually travel in a single vehicle — without a police escort — unless they’re with their families.

This sudden increase in security comes while Prince Harry is in London, attending a court hearing over the couple’s ongoing battle for family protection.

During the hearing, Harry’s lawyer said the couple stepped away from royal duties in 2020 because they felt unsafe and unprotected. They offered to keep working as private individuals, but according to them, security was never officially arranged or agreed upon.

Thanks for reading! Do you think Meghan’s security measures were justified — or too much? Share your opinion in the comments below.